AI, QUALITY & DELIVERY

Hire QA automation engineers & SDETs in India

Test automation and SDET skills to make your releases boring — in a good way.

Add QA engineers who treat testing as engineering: a maintainable automation suite wired into CI, sensible coverage, and manual exploratory testing where it genuinely helps. The goal is releases you can trust.

Share your hiring needs ↗

WHO THIS SUITS

The right fit for your team.

← All roles & technologies

Teams releasing nervously because regression testing is manual and slow
Products that have grown faster than their test coverage
Engineering managers who want automation wired into CI, not a pile of flaky scripts

PROBLEMS WE HELP SOLVE

The situations that bring teams to us.

Every release risks breaking something that already worked
Manual regression testing is slow and can't keep up with the release pace
There are automated tests, but they're flaky and nobody trusts them
There's no clear test strategy or view of what is actually covered

WHAT THEY CAN HELP YOU DELIVER

Concrete work, not job titles.

Design a test strategy and build a maintainable UI automation suite in Playwright or Cypress
Add API and contract tests and wire the whole suite into CI with clear reporting
Stabilise a flaky existing suite and bring it back to something the team trusts
Run structured manual and exploratory testing for areas automation can't cover well

TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES

Matched to your stack.

PlaywrightCypressSeleniumREST API testingJest / pytestCI (GitHub Actions / Azure)AppiumTest strategy

UI automation with Playwright, Cypress or Selenium
API, integration and contract testing
Test strategy, coverage planning and defect reporting
CI integration with reporting and sensible gating
Mobile test automation with Appium where needed; accessibility and performance checks

HOW COLLABORATION WORKS

Part of your team, not a black box.

01 /
Shared scope
We agree which journeys matter most and what coverage and gating you want before building.
02 /
Your process
Tests live in your repo and CI, reviewed like any other code, not run on the side.
03 /
Overlap hours
Overlap with your developers for triage and release windows is agreed per engagement.
04 /
Visible quality
Clear reporting on coverage, pass rates and defects so release confidence is evidence-based.

WAYS TO ENGAGE

Choose the model
that fits the work.

From one specialist to a dedicated team or a managed delivery. Availability, communication and commercial terms are agreed in writing before anyone starts.

Individual developer or specialist

One engineer with a specific skill, added to your team for a defined period.

Best when: You have a clear gap — a language, a framework or a specialism — and need one capable person.
Who directs the work: Your team sets daily priorities; the developer works within your process.

We propose a specific engineer against your technical needs and current availability
They work in your repositories, task board and review process
Scope, reporting and working-hours overlap are agreed before starting

Staff augmentation

One or more developers embedded in and managed by your existing team.

Best when: You want extra hands who work as part of your team, under your leadership, for as long as you need them.
Who directs the work: Your managers direct the work; our developers are part of your stand-ups and planning.

Developers integrate into your team, tools and ceremonies
You retain technical and product direction day to day
Capacity can change with agreed notice as your roadmap shifts

Dedicated development team

A standing team — developers plus the lead or QA you need — focused on your roadmap.

Best when: You have a sustained roadmap and want a team that builds continuity and context over time.
Who directs the work: Shared: you own product direction; we help coordinate delivery within the team.

A team assembled around your stack and goals, working only on your roadmap
Continuity of people and knowledge over the engagement
Collaboration, reporting and overlap hours defined up front and reviewed as you go

Compare engagement models in detail →

COMMON QUESTIONS

Clear answers before you commit.

Automated or manual QA — which do you provide?

Both, with a bias toward maintainable automation for regression and manual exploratory testing where it adds the most value. We agree the balance with you.

Which automation tools do you use?

Commonly Playwright, Cypress or Selenium for UI, plus API and contract testing, with Appium for mobile where needed. We work within your existing tooling where you already have it.

Can you fix our flaky, distrusted test suite?

Yes — stabilising an existing suite, removing flakiness and restoring trust is a common engagement, often more valuable than starting over.

Will QA engineers work alongside our developers?

Yes. They sit in your workflow — triaging with developers, reviewing in the same process and gating releases through your CI.

DISCUSS YOUR REQUIREMENTS

Tell us the skills
or the work.

A developer with a specific skill, a team to extend your capacity, or a project to deliver. Tell us where you are and where you want to go.

Share the role, skills or project and your constraints.
We discuss the fit, availability and open questions.
Agree an engagement model, overlap and next step.

info@arsteg.com ↗+91-844-747-0101

Hire QA automation engineers & SDETs in India

The right fit for your team.

The situations that bring teams to us.

Concrete work, not job titles.

Matched to your stack.

Part of your team, not a black box.

Shared scope

Your process

Overlap hours

Visible quality

Choose the modelthat fits the work.